GC29: Another Day of Reflection and Dialog

GC29: Another Day of Reflection and Dialog

(ANS – Turin – March 11, 2025) – GC29 dedicated much of Tuesday’s session to committee work, with several significant developments. Each day of this chapter seems to reinvent itself—not because the goals and methodology are unclear, but because the process unfolds through active listening to the needs and insights of the chapter members. Even when progress appears to stall, things are actually moving beneath the surface—guided by the Holy Spirit, which works quietly yet profoundly in hearts and minds.

A particularly complex and somewhat unexpected discussion arose regarding the requirement of priesthood to be directors, provincials, or the Rector Major. This was prompted by a Vatican rescript inviting religious congregations to consider the possibility of appointing lay consecrated members to governance roles. This issue calls for careful study, listening, and a dialog between tradition and the future. It is not simply a debate over differing ideas but rather a shared journey toward a response that is both responsible and prophetic.

During the session, votes were cast to resolve key issues related to the structure of the next general council and the reorganization of two regions. The focus then shifted to the so-called “third block” of topics, which began to take shape through precise thematic discussions.

The central committee carefully reviewed each proposal for deliberation. It was decided that even proposals presenting radically opposing solutions should proceed in parallel, while other closely related proposals were merged into a single, comprehensive resolution. Some decisions were postponed to future sessions, particularly those that do not require amendments to the Salesian Constitutions, as the chapter must prioritize matters that will (or will not) be submitted for Vatican approval.

By the end of the day, a general direction had emerged—though not yet a final decision—on the possibility of allowing coadjutors brothers to assume roles as community directors, provincials, or even the Rector Major.

The presidents or rapporteurs of the 6 committees presented their reports in the assembly, clarifying the content and objectives of their respective proposals. They also transparently indicated the level of support or opposition within their groups, ensuring that the deliberation process remains open and does not falsely suggest unanimous consensus while ignoring minority positions.

Another night of reflection and another day of dialog will be necessary to grasp fully the implications of any decision—so that when the time comes to vote, it will be done with complete awareness and responsibility.