Tuesday, February 17, 2026

Homily for Tuesday, Week 6 of Ordinary Time

Homily for Tuesday
Week 6 of Ordinary Time

Feb. 17, 2026
Mark 8: 14-21
Christian Brothers, St. Joseph Residence, N.R.

Christ with the apostles on the lake
(bas relief in Vatican City)

“Don’t you understand yet?” (Mark 8: 17).

Not for the 1st time, nor the last, Jesus is exasperated by his apostles, who’ve just witnessed his 2d multiplication of bread and fish.  Mark notes both the 1st and 2d miracles.  And now they’re whining—probably arguing—about not having any bread with them.

When Jesus asks—it’s a rhetorical question and probably displays some impatience—“Don’t you understand yet?”, he’s not concerned about bread.  A warning he’d voiced a moment before about the leaven of the Pharisees and of Herod (8:15) suggests concern about what those “chefs” have been feeding the people, possibly including the disciples.  For all the disputes Jesus has been having with the Pharisees, can we suppose the apostles haven’t been listening to, perhaps wondering about, the merits of the Pharisees’ teaching?

When Jesus asks them, “Don’t you understand?” and reminds them of 2 miracles (8:19-20), isn’t he pointing out that he backs up his teaching with powerful signs?  So they should ignore the Pharisees—and Herod, too, who presents a different form of corruption.

One commentator [1] makes another “bread” connection.  After using 5 loves and 2 fish to feed a massive crowd, Jesus crosses the lake.  In John 6, that leads to the discourse on the Eucharist in the synagog at Capernaum.  Here in Mark, we have only a reference to bread; the commentator hints that Jesus is suggesting that he has a more substantial bread to offer than do the Pharisees, even more substantial than what he just fed to the 4,000 in this 2d miracle.

Jesus offers real bread.  Worrying about whether they’ve got a meal in the boat, or who’s responsible if they don’t, isn’t a concern.  Jesus will take care of them.  He always does.

“Don’t you understand yet?”

[1] D.E. Nineham, The Gospel of St Mark (Baltimore: Penguin, 1975), pp. 213-214.

No comments: